Автор: In line with the results of the studies submitted to day, new WDQ generally seems to bring a standard and you may total way of measuring really works characteristics, which can be used by the scholars and you may practitioners equivalent often in order to make basic research on the character out of works or even build and remodel efforts within the groups [2, 39]. Because of the major changes present in the kind out-of one another opportunities and you may efforts in the last 2 decades , with getting ever more cognitively, relationally and psychologically built, implementing a complete raft of the latest properties, requires and you may competences , this new WDQ may provide the most effective way into investigation of your performs services knowledgeable from the the present gurus.
I used the adjusted Foreign language type of Morgeson’s and you may Humphrey’s Performs Construction Questionnaire (WDQ) determine task, studies, social and you may contextual properties. The size and style contains 77 activities delivered when you look at the five subscales: task (twenty-four factors), knowledge (19 items), societal (18 products) and you will contextual (thirteen points). Examples items are: “The job will bring me personally which have extreme self-reliance to make choices” (activity characteristics); “The job need me to display significant amounts of advice” (education properties); “The job affairs is actually significantly affected by the work of other people” (personal functions); “Much time must find out the gadgets utilized hands on” (perspective services).
The latest questionnaire demonstrated higher precision philosophy. Task features got a Cronbach alpha of ? = .96. Knowledge services had good Cronbach alpha of ? = .93. Public characteristics got an effective Cronbach leader away from ? = .92 and you can Context attributes got a good Cronbach alpha out of ? = .93.
Work-relevant desires and you may determination.
I utilized the Motivational Trait Survey (MTQ-Quick means) [54, 59]. Brand new questionnaire boasts 48 situations measuring about three size, particularly Individual mastery (sixteen affairs), competitive perfection (thirteen items) and you can desire anxiety (19 facts). The new response level ranged from 1 (“Most not the case away from me”) so you’re able to six (“Best shown out-of myself”). Analogy products are: “As i getting in search of a task, We you will need to discover as much regarding it whenever i is” (personal expertise); “It just upsets me personally an individual does one thing a lot better than We do” (aggressive excellence); and “When dealing with essential employment, I have alarmed that we make an error” (motivation anxiety).
The survey demonstrated large precision thinking in age groups. Individual mastery got a good Cronbach alpha out-of ? = .89petitive perfection got good Cronbach alpha out of ? = .88. Determination stress got an effective Cronbach leader regarding ? = .90.
Mental really works element.
The analysis utilized the Performs Feature List to measure really works function. Good mono-items measure was obtained to assess understood really works element compared to the new psychological activity needs. The item try: “Think that work feature within their most useful enjoys an esteem out-of 10 situations. How high would you determine your present work feature in regards to into psychological blogs of the functions?” The five-section reaction size ranged of “sub-standard” to help you “very good”.
Employment freedom objectives.
I used the business mobility product (“I am able to continue on operating from the altering business types of, even in the event I can already retire”) about Later years Objectives Level . Participants were requested in order to think amor en lineaprofielvoorbeelden about the long term in order to condition their level of agreement otherwise disagreement into the a great four-area measure (where step one imply “completely disagree” and 5 “totally agree”).
Mathematical research
The hypothesized relationships were assessed using the PROCESS macro for SPSS with Model 5, which estimates the indirect effect of X (Job characteristics) on Y (Psychological Work Ability/Job mobility Intentions) through the mediator M (Motivational Orientations), with a moderating role played by W (Age) in the X > Y (Job characteristics > Psychological Work Ability/Job mobility Intentions) relationship. The moderated hypothesis is supported when the direct process varies at different values assumed by the moderating variable . This procedure was based on 5000 bootstrap re-samples and estimates of the direct effect and associated confidence intervals conditional on specific levels of the moderator (Mean and +/- 1 SD from Mean). When zero is not included in the 95% bias-corrected confidence interval, it eter is significantly different from zero at p < .05.
