Автор: Though our analyses pick a good fit towards the studies, i looked at whether or not another model could match the content exactly as well or top (MacCallum, Wegener, Uchino, & Fabrigar, 1993). Figure 2 merchandise so it inversed causation option model below.
An option exploratory structural model: Imagine if sexual prejudice predicts correspondence and you may positive feel having homosexuals, detected resemblance with peers’ attitudes toward homosexuality, and you will religiosity. Every strong contours depict mathematically extreme paths at .05 top. Magnitudes out of connection is actually presented with the product quality mistakes within the parentheses; X 2 (61, Letter = 360) = . Normed (NFI), non-normed (NNFI), and you will comparative (CFI) goodness-of-complement is actually .91, .91, .93, respectively; RMSEA is .09.
Technically, it’s just since the possible that individuals having higher bad thinking to the homosexuality do stay away from interacting with gay people and you will lesbians, score their interactions due to the fact negative, seeing their friends since the with some other attitudes into gay some one, otherwise see support regarding their viewpoints in their religiosity
The fresh new approach design got a good fit, [? 2 (61, Letter = 360) = , p dos =11%); confident experience that have gay boys and you can lesbians (?=-.fifty, se = .06, p 2 =25%); recognized fellow similarities in their attitudes to the homosexuals (?=-.19, se = .08, p dos =4%); and, religiosity (?=.48, se = .04, p 2 =23%). High correlations was indeed discover with the disruptions away from perceived parallels having peers’ perceptions with the homosexuals as well as their prior relationships that have gay men and you may lesbians (r=.18, se = .06, p dos =.11); 25% out of participants’ self-confident event having homosexual someone (Roentgen 2 =.25); 4% regarding fellow similarities with homosexual people (R 2 =.04); and you can 23% out-of religiosity (Roentgen dos =.23).
If you find yourself such answers are notable, we opposed and therefore model fitting the information better utilising the Design AIC and you may Design CAIC coefficients getting non-nested model reviews and every models’ match indicator. The original design had a better complement (Design AIC=; Design CAIC=-; NFI = .92; NNFI = .92; CFI = .94; RMSEA = .08) compared to option model (Design AIC = & CAIC=-; NFI = .91; NNFI = .91; CFI = .93; RMSEA = .09). The difference for the match across the one or two patterns suggests the brand spanking new model’s theoretic rationale suits the details top (Byrne, 1994).
Talk
I setup a structural model to evaluate whether relationships and confident skills with homosexuals, understood parallels which have peers’ thinking to your homosexuality, and you may religiosity had been predictive out-of sexual prejudice one of an inhabitants off Puerto Rican young adults. Our conclusions highly recommend all latent variables, with the exception of peers’ thinking towards the homosexuality, predict participants’ sexual prejudice on gay everyone. When you find yourself past experts have found intimate prejudice could be high for males than just people (Kite, 1992; Herek, 2000b), we had been struggling to imitate these show.
Just how many homosexual persons understood by users reduced its stated sexual bias towards the homosexual visitors. This shopping for suggests that Puerto Rican youth’s sexual bias is influenced by the possible lack of exposure to gays and you will lesbians. The stigmatization of homosexual folks on the Puerto Rican neighborhood could possibly get limitation specific students’ experience of homosexual guys and lesbians. Within this population, taking inside the-class panels with gay males and you will lesbians, eg, will get helps students’ affairs which have homosexual people and you can lesbians. Most other scientists discovered this type of classroom items drop off certain heterosexual’s negative appraisals on homosexual males and you will lesbians (Sakalli & Ugurlu, 2001).
Our very own results also suggest that participants’ confident event which have gay people and you will lesbians exert an influence in their intimate bias on homosexual someone. Participants’ recollection regarding positive enjoy which have gay guys and you can lesbians try strongly predictive of its intimate bias. Additionally, the current presence of a positive association ranging from participants’ relations which have homosexuals and their remember away from self-confident enjoy using this type of class indicates an iterative techniques in which Puerto Rican young people you will raise otherwise disappear the purpose to activate with gay men during the later on moments. This type of results suggest that Puerto Rican more navigate to website youthful adults’ appraisals of its experience of homosexual folks are especially important into the design and you will utilization of activities to cut back intimate prejudice. Items and settings creating a host in which greet and you can unlock dialogue is stabilized will get assists positive interchanges. Search about what comprises confident skills between Puerto Rican heterosexual and homosexual people required.
