Автор: ‘ Reg Aven 215, 50To brand new bishop off Moray. Professors so you’re able to distribute Reginald Cheyn,donzel, and you will Murielle, damselle, d de- Keth,of Moray and you will Aberdeen dioceses, regarding obstacle in order to marriagearising on 3rd and you can 4th values out-of consanguinity.Fondi, 19 Kal. Feb., anno 1.SRO Vat. , iv, no. 46. ‘
1420), try developed to wed Reginald le Cheyne, young man ofSir Reginald ce Cheyne by the their partner (as their unique basic spouse), Helen ofStrathearn. When you’re you will find known gaps regarding origins out of MurielKeith, she and you will Reginald ce Cheyne carry out express a descent of theComyns. But not, this will be also faraway to need good dispensation ifMuriel was a good great-great-high grandd Comyn, Earlof Buchan (d. 1233), which will be the circumstances in the event that ‘s daughter.
Trans
2. Reginald ce Cheyne was an effective-grandson off Marjory Comyn,daughter out of Alexander Comyn, Earl out-of Buchan (d. 1290), sonof William Comyn in the above list. Her young buck is Malise, Earlof Strathearn away from 1312 so you can their demise when you look at the 1328 , andgrandfather from Reginald.
ca. 1270), wasidentical so you’re able to Marjory Comyn, and you will married 2ndly so you’re able to Malise, Earl ofStrathearn (d. 1312). This should suggest the brand new parentage ‘said to help you havebeen’ regarding Margaret, wife regarding Sir John de- Keith, try out of onegeneration: she’d not have already been brand new d Comyn,Earl out of Buchan, but rather away from their child Alexander. There clearly was noevidence that Earl Malise and you can Marjory Comyn have been hitched muchbefore 1275: just like the Lindsay had written,
There was you to discernable basis on which new relationshipbetween Reginald ce Cheyne and you may Muriel Keith could have resided: ifMargaret Comyn, partner of Sir John de Keith (d
‘ The brand new spouse regarding the earl, on 1275, was titled Marjory, due to the fact weunderstand the latest attesting term off Zero. cv., that is mentioned byWyntoun, Publication VIII. guy. vi., to have been next sisterof John Comyn, Earl regarding Buchan, which negotiated for the part ofEarl Malise the marriage settlement above mentioned [old atLondon, April twenty-six, 1293 to own his child Matilda and Robert deTony, child regarding Ralph].’
Alexander Comyn = Age de- QuincyE away from Buchan I__________________I________________I III1) Sir John = Marjory = 2) Malise de Keith I (als I E away from . 1270 We Margaret) I d. 1312_____________I__ ___I__________________________We I I We I ISir William Bernard Malise Gilbert Robert Maudde Keith de Keith Age out-of = Robertd. bef 1293 Strathearn; d. 1328 de TonyI ______I_______________________We We I ISir Edward Malise Mary Helen= Isabella de Age off Strathearn = 1) Sir ReginaldSynton d. ca. 1343 We le CheyneI I We = dream singles za stvarno 2) Sir DavidI V I I de GrahamSir William de We We__________Keith I We= Margaret Fraser __________________I_______ V__I_____________ I I IIII We I We Isiblings> Muriel + Reginald Mary MariotaKeith ce Cheyne(= RobertStewart,Duke of Albany)
Reginald ce Cheyne likely never ever partnered Muriel Keith, and you can isknown to have passed away sine prole. Robert Stewart and Muriel Keithhad a beneficial dispensation to help you marry old 4 Can get 1380, very Reginald likelydied some time in advance of you to time , most likely till the plannedmarriage took place. The foregoing solution, in addition tocorrecting the fresh Keith-Comyn origins, will enhance exact same withdescents away from Roger de- Quincy, Earl regarding Winchester and his wifeElen/Helen from Galloway (along with Magna Carta, Carolingian andother fascinating ancestry).
SP VIII:247, sandwich _Old Earls of Strathearn_. Discover alsoWilliam Alexander Lindsay, K.C., Windsor Herald; John Dowden,D.D., LL.D.; and you may John Maitland Thomson, LL.D., eds., Charters,Bulls or any other Documents relating to the Abbey off Inchaffray(Edinburgh: T. and you may An effective. Constable, 1908 — Scottish HistorySociety, third Series, Vol. 56), pp. lxvii-lxix.
John P is actually same as Marjory Comyn, and partnered 2ndly so you’re able to Malise, Earl out-of Strathearn (d. 1312). This would imply this new parentage ‘said to have been’ compared to Margaret, spouse out-of Sir John de- Keith, was regarding one to generation: she would n’t have started the new d Comyn, Earl regarding Buchan, but instead off their young man Alexander. There’s no evidence one Earl Malise and you can Marjory Comyn was in fact partnered much prior to 1275 >>
