11.05.2025

E. (1985)patibility during the mother-newborn relationships: Origins and operations

E. (1985)patibility during the mother-newborn relationships: Origins and operations

Lamb, Yards. Age., & Gilbride, K. Inside W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and you will incompatible dating (pp. 33-60). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Links ]

Thought of resemblance and you may matchmaking success certainly one of dating lovers: An enthusiastic idiographic strategy

Lee, hur man avbryter kontot pГҐ asiandate L., Loewenstein, G., Ariely, D., Hong, J., & More youthful, J. (2008). In the event that I am not saying hot, are you presently scorching or otherwise not?: Physical-elegance evaluations and you can relationship needs since a purpose of one’s individual appeal. Psychological Science, 19, 669677. [ Links ]

Levinger, Grams., & Rands, Yards. (1985)patibility in-marriage or other close relationship. Into the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you can incompatible relationship (pp. 309-331). New york: Springer-Verlag. [ Links ]

Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. (1944). Number of ambition. From inside the J. McV. Search (Ed.), Identity together with behavior conditions (Vol. step 1, pp. 333378). Nyc: Ronald Drive. [ Website links ]

Enjoying, T. J. (2006). Predicting dating matchmaking fate which have insiders’ and you can outsiders’ position: Whom and you may what’s asked matters. Private Relationship, thirteen, 349-362. [ Backlinks ]

Luo, S., & Klohnen, Elizabeth. C. (2005). Assortative mating and relationship quality into the newly wedded couples: One or two dependent method. Log of Identification and you can Social Psychology, 88, 304-326. [ Backlinks ]

Madden, Meters., & Lenhart, An effective. (2006). Online dating. Arizona, DC: Statement with the Pew Websites & Western Lives Opportunity. Retrieved , out of [ Backlinks ]

MacDonald, T. K., & Ross, Yards. (1999). Assessing the precision out-of forecasts on matchmaking dating: Just how and exactly why perform lovers’ forecasts differ from those people from perceiver? Character and you can Societal Therapy Bulletin, 25, 14171429. [ Links ]

ater, J., & Smith, S. (1982). Legitimizing issues on the initiation from heterosexual relationship. Paper demonstrated from the Very first Around the globe Fulfilling toward Individual Relationships, Madison, WI. [ Hyperlinks ]

Merkle, Age.Roentgen., & Richardson, Roentgen.A. (2000). Digital relationships and you may virtual related: Conceptualizing pc mediated close relationship. Friends, forty-two, 187-192. [ Links ]

Montoya, Roentgen. M., Horton, R. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Is genuine similarity very important to interest? A beneficial meta-studies away from genuine and you can seen resemblance. Log from Public and personal Relationships, twenty five, 889-922. [ Hyperlinks ]

Morry, Yards. Yards. (2005). Dating satisfaction as the a good predictor out-of resemblance critiques; A test of the appeal-resemblance hypothesis. Log of Public and private Relationship, 22, 561-584. [ Website links ]

Record regarding Public and personal Relationship, 23, 865-880

Morry, M. Yards. (2007). The new destination-resemblance hypothesis among cross-sex nearest and dearest: Relationship fulfillment, observed parallels, and you may care about-providing attitudes. Journal away from Personal and personal Dating, 24, 117-138. [ Website links ]

Murstein, B. We. (1987). A clarification and extension of the SVR principle out-of dyadic combining. Diary out-of ily, 44, 929-947. [ Hyperlinks ]

Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J. Hassan, H., & Horrocks, J. (2002). Who will split up: Good fourteen-12 months longitudinal study of black partners and you will white couples. Log regarding Social and private Matchmaking, 19, 179-202. [ Backlinks ]

Orenstein, S. (). The fresh like formula Match believes it’s got located an algorithm having ruling the net matchmaking business: A technical approach to finding Mr. or Ms. Right. Team 2.0 Mag. Retrieved to the out of [ Hyperlinks ]

Rammstedt, B., & Schupp, J. (2008). Precisely the congruent endure — Identification similarities within the lovers. Identification and you may Personal Variations, 45, 533-535. [ Hyperlinks ]

Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., Christopher, S., & Cate, Roentgen. (2000). Partner preferences: Just what qualities manage visitors desire inside their brief-title sexual and you may enough time-label personal partners? Diary away from Psychology and you will Individual Sexuality, twelve, 1-21. [ Backlinks ]

Reis, H. T. (1985). The fresh new role of notice in the initiation and span of public telecommunications. Into the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and you will incompatible relationships (pp. 209-231). Nyc: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Backlinks ]

Добавить комментарий

Ваш адрес email не будет опубликован. Обязательные поля помечены *