15.05.2025

Advice, apply to, and you may candidate sex when you look at the You

Advice, apply to, and you may candidate sex when you look at the You

101 . Newhagen , John E. , “Beyond self-report: Having fun with latency to answer design issue responding techniques into web-mainly based public-opinion surveys,” regarding Sourcebook to have Political Communication Browse , eds. Bucy , Erik P. and you will Lance Holbert , Roentgen. ( Nyc : Routledge , 2011 ).Yahoo Scholar

102 . Oxley , Douglas R. , Smith , Kevin B. , Alford , John R. , Hibbing , Matthew V. , Miller , Jennifer L. , Scalora , Mario , Hatemi , Peter K. , and you can Hibbing , John R. , “Governmental attitudes vary which have psychological attributes,” Science , 321 : 1667 – 1670 .CrossRefGoogle Pupil

103 . Swers , Michele L. , “Are feminine very likely to vote for ladies affairs expense than just their male acquaintances?” Legislative Knowledge Quarterly 1998 , 23 : 435 – 448 .CrossRefGoogle Student

104 . Swers , Michele L. , The difference Women Generate: The policy Impact of women for the Congress ( Chi town : College or university out of Chi town Push , 2002 ).Google Beginner

105 . Slope , Kim Quaile and you may Hurley , Patricia A beneficial. , “Symbolic speeches in the U.S. Senate in addition to their representational implications,” Log from Politics 2002 , 64 : 219 – 231 .CrossRefGoogle Pupil

108 . Mansbridge , Jane , “Is to blacks represent blacks and women represent women? A beneficial contingent ‘yes’,” Journal off Politics 1999 , 61 ( 3 ): 627 – 657 .CrossRefGoogle Pupil

109 . Sanbonmatsu , Kira , “Gender-associated political education and detailed symbol of females,” Political Conclusion 2003 , twenty-five : 367 – 388 .CrossRefGoogle Beginner

110 . Dolan , Kathleen , “Could there be an excellent ‘gender attraction effect’ inside Western government? S. House elections,” Political Lookup Quarterly 2008 , 61 : 79 – 89 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

This article could have been quoted because of the pursuing the courses. It record is made predicated on data provided with Crossref.

Benstead, Lindsay J. Jamal, Amaney An excellent. and Lust, Ellen 2015. Is it Gender, Religiosity otherwise One another? A role Congruity Theory of Applicant Electability during the Transformation Tunisia. Views into the Politics, Vol. thirteen, Situation. 1, p. 74.

Bauer, Nichole Meters. 2015. Whom stereotypes feminine candidates? Identifying private differences in female where can i find sexy women to marry china stereotype dependency. Government, Communities, and you may Identities, Vol. 3, Procedure. 1, p. 94.

Rosenthal , Cindy Simon , “The latest character from gender during the descriptive sign,” Political Browse Quarterly 1995 , 48 : 599 – 611

McLaughlin, Bryan Davis, Catasha Coppini, David Kim, More youthful Mie Knisely, Sandra and you will McLeod, Douglas 2015. Whenever feminine assault. Government and also the Existence Sciences, Vol. 34, Material. step one, p. forty two.

Pyeatt, Nicholas L. and you can Yanus, Alixandra B. 2016. Giving blended indicators: the latest character regarding gender and you can partisanship for the evaluations of people in politics. Log regarding Elections, Public opinion and you will People, Vol. twenty-six, Question. cuatro, p. 423.

Koch, Thomas and you will Obermaier, Magdalena 2016. Which have Heart and you can (No) Brain? How Users Negatively Infer Forgotten Factual statements about Politicians and just how So it Has an effect on the latest Testing of your own Speakermunication Look, Vol. 43, Question. seven, p. 972.

Turska-Kawa, Agnieszka and you will Olszanecka-. Stereotypes Choosing Perceptions away from Female Political leaders: The situation of Poland. Politics inside Main European countries, Vol. 14, Topic. 3, p. eight.

Schneider, Monica C. and you may Bos, Angela L. 2019. The application of Social Role Concept into the Study of Gender from inside the Government. Political Mindset, Vol. 40, Thing. S1, p. 173.

Park, Sunshine More youthful and you will Baek, Younger Minute 2019. Citizens’ Ambivalence into Women People in politics: As to the reasons Ambivalence Issues for Gender Equality inside the a beneficial Democracy. Log of women, Politics & Plan, Vol. forty, Point. 2, p. 309.

Rusidze, Nino 2019. Stereotypes, Character Assassination and you will Feamales in Government. Corvinus Record of Internationally Things, Vol. 4, Procedure. step 1, p. fifteen.

Aaldering, Loes and you may Van Der Pas, Daphne Joanna 2020. Political Frontrunners from the Media: Gender Bias into the Chief Stereotypes throughout Campaign and Regimen Moments. Uk Journal out of Political Technology, Vol. fifty, Question. step 3, p. 911.

Boer, Noortje 2020. Just how do Residents Evaluate Roadway?Level Bureaucrats’ Enthusiasm and you can Ability? A Typology and you will Attempt. Public Administration Opinion, Vol. 80, Matter. cuatro, p. 532.

Добавить комментарий

Ваш адрес email не будет опубликован. Обязательные поля помечены *