Gonzaga, Grams. C., Haselton, Yards. G., Smurda, J., Davies, Meters. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Development and you will Human Decisions, 29(2), 119–126.
Hazan, C., & Diamond Anbefalet lГ¦sning, L. Meters. (2000). The place of accessory inside human mating. Review of General Therapy, 4(2), 186–204.
Kraut, Roentgen., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Sites paradox reviewed. Diary off Societal Affairs, 58(1), 49–74.
Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet contradiction: A social tech that decrease public involvement and you can psychological better-becoming? Western Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
Kreider, Roentgen.Meters., & Areas, J. Yards. (2001). Matter, timing, and time of marriages and divorces. Newest Inhabitants Account, 70-80, (Washington, DC: You.S. Census Bureau, 2005).
Lemieux, Roentgen., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional data off intimacy, welfare, and you can union: Comparison the newest presumptions of the triangular concept off love. Psychological Records, 90(step 3,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.ninety.step three.1009-1014
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Age. (2004). Impact most readily useful regarding performing worse: Public comparisons inside personal relationships. Diary off Character and you can Social Mindset, 87(1), 80–95.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A beneficial., & Gailliot, Yards. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: The latest implicit knowledge of romantic rivalry. Record out of Identification and you can Personal Mindset, 97(1), 74–87.
A great. (2001)mitment and you may matchmaking repairs mechanisms
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. Good., & Gonzaga, Grams. C. (2008). Automatic inattention to glamorous selection: The brand new progressed psychology regarding relationships restoration. Progression and you may Peoples Behavior, 29(5), 343–349.
pold, B. Elizabeth. (1981). Sequential investigation away from disagreement and you will agreement for the troubled and you will nondistressed relationship lovers. Journal from Contacting and Clinical Therapy, 49(4), 554–567.
McKenna, K. Y. Good., Environmentally friendly, An excellent. S., Gleason, Meters. J. (2002). Relationships development on the internet: What is the huge interest? Log out of Social Situations, 58(1), 9–31.
The great benefits of positive illusions: Idealization in addition to construction of fulfillment when you look at the romantic relationship
Neff, L. A., & Karney, B. R. (2002). Self-testing motives when you look at the personal relationships: A style of international improvement and you can specific confirmation. Into the P. Noller & J. Good. Feeney (Eds.), Facts ents on examination of partners communication (pp. 32–58). Nyc, NY: Cambridge School Push.
Obegi, J. H. (2008). The development of the consumer-specialist bond through the lens out-of accessory principle. Psychotherapy: Principle, Browse, Routine, Degree, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Brand new social overseeing program: Improved susceptibility so you’re able to social signs due to the fact an adaptive a reaction to social different. From inside the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), New social outcast: Ostracism, public exemption, getting rejected, and bullying (pp. 213–226). Ny, NY: Mindset Push.
Penetrate, T., & Lydon, J. E. (2001). Around the world and you will specific relational habits regarding contact with social affairs. Diary regarding Character and you can Personal Therapy, 80(4), 613–631.
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. An effective., Tran, S., ). Connection and you can advice seeking during the close dating. Character and you may Personal Mindset Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.
Ross, L. Roentgen., & Spinner, B. (2001). Standard and you may particular accessory representations from inside the adulthood: Could there be a relationship?. Diary Regarding Societal And private Relationships, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001
Rusbult, C. Elizabeth., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. For the J. Harvey & A. Wenzel (Eds.), Romantic close relationships: Restoration and improvement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schul, Y., & Vinokur, A beneficial. D. (2000). Projection privately effect certainly one of partners as a function of the fresh new similarity within mutual knowledge. Identification And you will Personal Therapy Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008
Seligman, C., Fazio, Roentgen. H., & Zanna, Meters. P. (1980). Aftereffects of salience of extrinsic perks to the liking and you will enjoying. Diary regarding Personality and you can Social Psychology, 38(3), 453–460.