Автор: Rabbi Judah ha-Nasi (latter half of the second and beginning of the third century C.E.), considered to be the redactor of the Codification of basic Jewish Oral Law; edited and arranged by R. Judah ha-Nasi c. 200 C.E. Mishnah , made a statement that started a trend of legal http://datingmentor.org/escort/pasadena/ development resulting in the elimination of the category of normal menstruation and its replacement by the category of abnormal bleeding, ziva. His statement reflects the possible confusion in keeping track of one’s period, especially in light of the new system of pithei niddah. If this was done intentionally, the couple incurred the punishment of karet; if done unintentionally, they were obligated to bring a sin offering. Atonement by sacrifice, however, could not be made after the destruction of the Temple in the year 70 C.E. Great efforts were therefore made to prevent inadvertent sins of this nature. Joseph citing Rav Judah who had it from Rav stated: Rabbi ordained at Sadot: If a woman observed a discharge on one day she must wait six days in addition to it. If she observed discharges on two days she must wait six days in addition to these. If she observed a discharge on three days she must wait seven clean days.”
Later he stood so you’re able to pray
It declaration of the Rabbi Judah ha-Nasi generally got rid of all of the menstruating female throughout the regular monthly period category and you can placed them throughout the unpredictable standing from zava since the majority regular attacks past at the very least three days. Frequently their question is one considering the cutting-edge clarifications wanted to determine when one is niddah and when it’s possible to become a beneficial zava, one to you’ll started to make a mistake with grievous effects. First the newest decree had restricted effect; it appears to be having started regional, and can even had been limited by times when question is in it in addition to regional inhabitants wasn’t sufficiently learned to choose in instance products ( Rabbi Solomon ben Isaac; b. Troyes, France, 1040 Rashi ). Yes it wasn’t an over-all decree for everybody of Israel, it is step one where assistance. In the 1st a few examples, Rabbi’s statement works with a female just who is generally a minor zava or may be a good niddah. She actually is addressed in the first instance given that good niddah, with a eight-go out age impurity, in the place of one-day from impurity during the day away from hemorrhaging, which is the code to own a zava. On the next analogy she actually is managed because a beneficial niddah and you will a zava in case your first day ended up being during the this lady ziva several months (the eleven days anywhere between monthly period episodes). On the third state, she actually is treated because the a complete zava. All the around three rulings make much more strict position.
BT Niddah 66a provides Rabbi’s report: “R
Subsequent statements by other sages make it absolutely certain that it was understood to be a general ent are from the amoraim, the sages who created the Palestinian and Babylonian Talmudim. Amoraim could not dispute tannaitic rulings without tannaitic support but they created fences around the Torah to prevent inadvertent sins. We find a aic) «spokesman.» Scholars active during the period from the completion of the Mishnah (c. 200 C.E.) until the completion of the Jerusalem and Babylonian Talmuds (end of the fourth and fifth centuries respectively), who were active primarily in the interpretation of the Mishnah. In the chain of tradition they follow the tanna’im and precede the savora’im. amora Rav Huna in JT Berakhot (5:1, 8d): “Rav Huna said: One who sees a drop of blood like [the size of a] mustard seed sits and keeps [because of it] seven clean days. ” The statement was made as an example of an undisputed law from which one could then turn to prayer. Such a law would clear one’s mind because there were no arguments about it, thereby allowing one to focus totally on prayer. Rav Huna’s statement is much more radical than the tannaitic version quoted above. According to him, all women who see uterine blood are in the category of the complete zava, regardless of the size of the blood stain and despite the normalcy of menstruation or having seen such blood only one or two days.
